Free Access
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 17, Number 1, January-March 2004
Page(s) 47 - 55
Published online 15 January 2004
  • Albaret J.J., 1999, Les peuplements des estuaires et des lagunes. In: Lévêque C., Paugy D. (Eds.) Les poissons des eaux continentales africaines : diversité, écologie, utilisation par l'homme. IRD, Paris, pp. 325-349. [Google Scholar]
  • Albaret J.J., Simier M., Darboe F.S., Ecoutin J.M., Raffray J., Tito de Morais L., 2004, Fish diversity and distribution in the Gambia Estuary, West Africa, in relation to environmental variables. Aquat. Living Resour. 17, 35-46. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Belliard J., Boët P., Tales E., 1997, Regional and longitudinal patterns of fish community structure in the Seine River basin, France. Environ. Biol. Fish. 50, 133-147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Borgmann U., 1987, Models on the slope of, and biomass flow up, the biomass spectrum. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44, 136-140. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brandt S.B., 1996, Acoustic assessment of fish abundance and distribution. In: Murphy B.R. Willis D.W. (Eds.) Fisheries Techniques, 2nd edition. Am. Fish. Soc. pp. 385-432. [Google Scholar]
  • Brehmer P., Gerlotto F., Guillard J., Sanguinède F., Guennégan Y., Buestel D., 2003, New applications of under-acoustics methods for monitoring shallow water aquatic ecosystems: the case of mussel culture grounds in open sea. Aquat. Living Resour. 16, 333-338. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Cottingham K.L., Brown B.L., Lennon J.T., 2001, Biodiversity may regulate the temporal variability of ecological systems. Ecol. Lett. 4, 72-85. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cowx I.G., 1996, Stock assessment in inland fisheries. Fishing News Books, Blackwell Sci. Publ., London. [Google Scholar]
  • Daget J., 1960, La faune ichtyologique du bassin de la Gambie. Bull. Inst. Fr. Afr. N., 22, 611-619. [Google Scholar]
  • Debruyn A.M.H., Marcogliese D.J., Rasmussen J.B., 2002, Regional analysis of body size and population density in stream fish assemblages: testing predictions of the energetic equivalence rule. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59, 819-828. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dorr J.A.III, Schneeberger P.J., Tin H.T., Flath L.E., 1985, Studies on adult, juvenile and larval fishes of the Gambia river, West Africa, 1983-1984, Report n° 11, Great Lakes and Marine Waters Center international programs, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. [Google Scholar]
  • Duncan A., Butterworth A.J., Gerlotto F., Kubecka J., 1998, Editorial. Fish. Res. 35, 1-3. [Google Scholar]
  • Foote K.G., Knudsen H., Vestnes G. 1987, Calibration of acoustic instruments for fish density estimation: a practical guide. ICES Coop. Res. Rep. 144. [Google Scholar]
  • Frear P.A., 2002, Hydroacoustic target strength validation using angling creel census data. Fish. Manage. Ecol. 9, 343-350. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fréon P., Misund O.A., 1999, Dynamics of pelagic fish distribution and behaviour: effects on fisheries and stock assessment. Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science, Oxford. [Google Scholar]
  • Fréon P, Dagorn L., 2000, Review of fish associative behaviour: toward a generalisation of the meeting point hypothesis. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 10, 183-207. [Google Scholar]
  • Gerlotto F., Soria M., Fréon P., 1999, From two dimensions to three: the use of multibeam sonar for a new approach in fisheries acoustics. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56, 6-12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Guillard J., 1998, Daily migration cycles of fish populations in a tropical estuary (Sine-Saloum, Senegal) using a horizontal-directed split-beam transducer and multibeam sonar. Fish. Res. 35, 21-29. [Google Scholar]
  • Guillard J., Boet P., Gerdeaux D, Roux P., 1994, Application of mobile acoustic techniques fish survey in shallow waters: the river Seine. Regul. Rivers 9, 121-126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Harvey J., Cowx I.G., 1996, Electric fishing for assessment of fish stocks in large rivers. In: Cowx I.G. (Ed.) Stock Assessment in Inland Fisheries. Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp. 11-26. [Google Scholar]
  • Hughes S., 1998, A mobile horizontal hydroacoustic fisheries survey of the River Thames, United Kingdom. Fish. Res. 35, 91-97. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jorgensen R. Olsen K., 2002, Acoustic target strength of capelin measured by single-target tracking in a controlled cage experiment. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 59, 1081-1085. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Knudsen F.R. Sægrov H., 2002, Benefits from horizontal beaming during acoustic survey: application to three Norwegian lakes. Fish. Res. 56, 205-211. [Google Scholar]
  • Krumme U., Saint-Paul U., 2003, Observations of fish migration in a macrotidal mangrove channel in Northern Brazil using a 200 kHz split-beam sounder. Aquat. Living Resour. 16, 175-184. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Kubecka J., Duncan A., 1998, Acoustic size vs. real size relationships for common species of riverine fish. Fish. Res. 35, 115-125. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kubecka J., Frouzova J., Vilcinskas A., Wolter C., Slavik O., 2000, longitudinal hydroacoustic survey of fish in the Elbe River supplemented by dircet capture. In: Cowx I.G. (Ed.) Stock Assessment in Inland Fisheries. Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp. 14-26. [Google Scholar]
  • Kubecka J., Wittingerova M., 1998, Horizontal beaming as a crucial component of acoustic fish stock assessment in freshwater reservoirs. Fish. Res. 35, 99–106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Laë R., Ecoutin J.M., Mendy A., Raffray J., Weigel J.Y., Sadio O., Djobe O., 2004, Effects of a targeted shrimp (Penaeus notialis) exploitation on fish catches in the Gambia estuary. Aquat. Living Resour. 17, 75-85. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Lesack L.F.W., 1986, Estimates of catch and potential yield for riverine artisanal fishery in The Gambia, West Africa. J. Fish Biol. 28, 679-700. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lesack L.F.W., Hecky R.E., Melack J.M., 1984, Transport of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and major solutes in the Gambia River, West Africa. Limnol. Oceanogr. 29, 816-830. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Love R.H., 1977, Target strength of an individual fish at any aspect. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72, 1397-1402. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lilja J., Keskinen T., Marjomäki T.J., Valkeajärvi P., Karjalainen J., 2003, Upstream migration activity of cyprinids and percids in a channel, monitored by a horizontal split-beam echosounder. Aquat. Living Resour. 16, 185-190. [Google Scholar]
  • Lyons J., 1998, A hydroacoustic assessment of fish stocks in the River Trent, England. Fish. Res. 35, 83-90. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • MacLennan D., Fernandes P.G., Dalen J., 2002, A consistent approach to definitions and symbols in fisheries acoustics. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 59, 365-369. [Google Scholar]
  • MacLennan D.N., Simmonds E.J., 1992, Fisheries acoustics, Chapman and Hall, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Mouse P.J., Kemper J., 1996, Applications of a hydroacoustic sampling technique in a large wind-exposed shallow lake. In: Cowx I.G. (Ed.) Stock Assessment in Inland Fisheries. Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp. 179-195. [Google Scholar]
  • Mulligan T., 2000, Shallow water fisheries sonar: a personal view. Aquat. Living Resour. 13, 269-273. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Schramm H.L., Grado S.C., Pugh L.L., 2001, The costs of sampling fishes in riverine habitats of a large river. Fish. Res. 56, 51-57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sprent P., 1992, Pratique des statistiques non paramétriques. INRA Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Thorne D., 1998, Review: experiences with shallow water acoustics. Fish. Res. 35, 137-142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Trevorrow M., Burczynski J., Kubecka J., 2000, Editorial. Aquat. Living Resour. 13, 267. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Vidy G., Darboe F.S., Mbye E.M., 2004, Juvenile fish assemblages in the creeks of the Gambia estuary. Aquat. Living Resour. 17, 56-64. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.