Effect of different feeding regimes in amur common carp fingerlings: compensatory growth, physio-metabolic responses, and expression of IGF-1 gene

Open Access

Table 5

Anti-oxidative enzyme activity of amur common carp fingerlings reared in pond for 120 days.

Treatments¹	SOD²	CAT³	GPx⁴
TC	20.21 ± 3.03^b	1.61 ± 0.2^b	1.32 ± 0.26^a
T1/1	14.14 ± 1.6^a	1.67 ± 0.32^b	2.53 ± 0.27^bc
T1/2	43.95 ± 1.56^d	4.12 ± 0.62^d	5.09 ± 0.37^e
T2/1	12.41 ± 0.75^a	0.38 ± 0.07^a	2.06 ± 0.21^b
T2/2	24.47 ± 1.92^c	3.13 ± 0.75^c	3.95 ± 0.29^d

Data is expressed as Mean ± SD (n = 30). Column wise altered superscript statistically implies significant difference (P < 0.05).

TC (daily feeding), T1/1 (1-day feeding/ 1-day starvation), T2/1 (2-days feeding/ 1-day starvation), T2/2 (2-days feeding/ 2-days starvation), and T1/2 (1-day feeding/ 2-days starvation).

activity denoted as µmol/mg protein/min at 37 °C.

CAT, catalase activity denoted as nanomoles of H₂O₂ decomposed/min/mg protein at 37 °C.

⁴

GPx, glutathione peroxidase activity denoted as nanomoles of H₂O₂ decomposed/min/mg protein at 37 °C.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.