Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries
Free Access
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 22, Number 4, October-December 2009
Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries
Page(s) 535 - 547
Published online 01 September 2009
  • Berthou P., Guyader O., Leblond E., Demanèche S., Daurès F., Merrien C., Lespagnol P., 2008, From fleet census to sampling schemes: an original collection of data on fishing activity for the assessment of the French fisheries. ICES CM 2008/ K: 12.
  • Bertignac M., 1992, Les rendements par espèce de la pêche chalutière hauturière française de l'Atlantique Nord-Est entre 1972 et 1989. Aquat. Living Resour. 5, 261–275. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Biseau A., 1998, Definition of a directed fishing effort in a mixed-species trawl fishery, and its impact on stock assessments. Aquat. Living Resour. 11, 119-136. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Dardignac J., 1984, Les pêcheries du golfe de Gascogne, Bilan des connaissances. Rapp. Ifremer, DRV.
  • Daurès F., Planchot M., Demanèche S., Van Iseghem S., Berthou P., Leblond E., Jezequel M., 2007, Contribution et dépendance des flottilles de pêches aux espèces commerciales majeures du golfe de Gascogne. Rapp. Ifremer, DEM
  • Duarte R., Azedevo M., Afonso-Dias M., 2009, Segmentation and fishery characteristics of the mixed-species mutli-gear Portuguese fleet. ICES J. Mar.Sci. 66, 594-606. [CrossRef]
  • Decamps P., Léauté J.P., 1988, Flottilles de pêches maritimes du sud du golfe de Gascogne. Ifremer, Rapp. Scient. Techn. 13.
  • FAO 2003, The ecosystem approach to fisheries. FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries, 4, Suppl. 2, FAO, Rome.
  • Garcia S.M., Cochrane K.L., 2005, Ecosystem approach to fisheries: a review of implementation guidelines. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 62, 311–318. [CrossRef]
  • He X., Bigelow K.A., Boggs C.H., 1997, Cluster analysis of longline sets and fishing strategies within the Hawaii-based fishery. Fish. Res. 31, 147–158. [CrossRef]
  • Hilborn R., 1985, Fleet dynamics and individual variation: why some people catch more fish than others. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 32, 2–13. [CrossRef]
  • Holley J.F., Marchal P., 2004, Fishing strategy development under changing conditions: examples from the French offshore fleet fishing in the North Atlantic. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 61, 1410–1431. [CrossRef]
  • Le Floc'h, P., Daurès F., Bihel J., Boncoeur J., Brigaudeau C., Thebaud O., 2007, Analyzing fishermen behaviour face to increasing energy costs – A French case study. ICES CM 2007/ M: 09.
  • Le Floc'h P., Daurès F., Brigaudeau C., Bihel J., 2008, A comparison of economic performance in the fisheries sector: a short and long term perspective. Mar. Policy 32, 421–431. [CrossRef]
  • Leblond E., Daurès F., Berthou P., Dintheer C., 2008, The Fisheries Information System of Ifremer: a multidisciplinary monitoring network and an integrated approach for the assessment of French fisheries, including small-scale fisheries. ICES CM 2008/ K: 11.
  • Leblond E., Daurès F., Berthou P., 2007, La Synthèse des flottilles de pêche 2005 - Flotte mer du Nord-Manche-Atlantique. IFREMER, SIH.
  • Lewy P., Vinther M., 1992, Identification of Danish North Sea trawl fleets and fisheries. ICES CM 1992/ G: 45.
  • Mahévas S., Sandon, Y., Biseau A., 2004, Quantification of annual variations in fishing power due to vessel characteristics: an application to the bottom-trawlers of South-Brittany targeting anglerfish (Lophius budegassa and Lophius piscatorius). ICES J. Mar. Sci. 61, 71–83. [CrossRef]
  • Marchal P., 2008, A comparative analysis of métiers and catch profiles for some French demersal and pelagic fleets. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 65, 674–686. [CrossRef]
  • Marchal P., Andersen B., Bromley D., Iriondo A., Mahévas S., Quirijn F.J., Rackham B., Santurtún M., Tien, N., Ulrich C., 2006, Improving the definition of fishing effort for important European fleets by accounting for the skipper effect. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63, 510–533. [CrossRef]
  • Merino G., Maynou F., Garcia-Olívares A., 2007a, Effort dynamics in a fisheries bioeconomic model: a vessel level approach through game theory. Sci. Mar. 71, 537–550.
  • Merino G., Maynou, F., Garcia-Olívares A., 2007b, A new bioeconomic simulation tool for small scale fisheries based on game theory: GAMEFISTO model. Aquat. Living Resour. 20, 223–230. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Murawski S.A., Lange A.M., Sissenwine M.P., Mayo R.K., 1983, Definition and analysis of multispecies otter-trawl fisheries off the northeast coast of the United States. J. Cons. CIEM 41, 13–27.
  • Pech N., Laloë F., 1997, Use of principal component analysis with instrumental variables (PCAIV) to analyse fisheries catch data. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 54, 32–47. [CrossRef]
  • Pelletier D., Mahevas S., Drouineau H., Vermard Y., Thebaud O. Guyader O., Poussind B., 2009, Valuation of the bioeconomic sustainability of multi-species multi-fleet fisheries under a wide range of policy options using ISIS-Fish. Ecol. Model. 220, 1013–1333. [CrossRef]
  • Pradhan N.C., Leung P., 2004, Modeling entry, stay, and exit decisions of the longline fishers in Hawaii. Mar. Policy 28, 311–324. [CrossRef]
  • Quirijns F.J., Poos J.J., Rijnsdorp A.D., 2008, Standardizing commercial CPUE data in monitoring stock dynamics: accounting for targeting behaviour in mixed fisheries. Fish. Res. 89, 1–8. [CrossRef]
  • Salas S., Gaertner D., 2004, The behavioural dynamics of fishers: management implications. Fish Fish. 5, 153–167.
  • Vermard Y., Marchal P., Mahévas S., Thebaud O., 2008, A dynamic model of the Bay of Biscay pelagic fleet simulating fishing trip choice: the response to the closure of the anchovy fishery in 2005. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 65, 2444–2453. [CrossRef]
  • Ward J.M., Sutinen J.G., 1994, Vessel entry-exit behavior in the Gulf of Mexico shrimp fishery. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 76, 916–923. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.