EDP Sciences Journals List
Home Document
Subscriber Authentication Point
Free access article

Issue Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 17, Number 2, April-June 2004
Page(s) 175 - 183
DOI 10.1051/alr:2004016

References of  Aquat. Living Resour. 17, 175-183 (2004)
  • Agresti A., 1990, Categorical data analysis. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics. Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York.
  • Bayliff W., Holland K., 1986, Materials and methods for tagging tuna and billfishes, recovering the tags and handling the recapture data. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. 279.
  • Berger J.O., Berry D.A., 1988, Statistical analysis and the illusion of objectivity. Am. Scient. 76, 159-165.
  • Bernier J., Parent E., Boreux J.-J., 2000, Statistique pour l'environnement. Traitement bayésien de l'incertitude. Ed. Tec & Doc., Paris.
  • Chen Y., Breen P.A., Andrew N.L., 2000, Impacts of outliers and mis-specification of priors on Bayesian fisheries-stock assessment. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57, 2293-2305 [CrossRef].
  • Fonteneau A., Diouf T., 1994, An efficient way of bait fishing for tunas recently developed in Senegal. Aquat. Living Resour. 7, 139-151.
  • Fried S.M., Hilborn R., 1988, Inseason forecasting of Bristol Bay, Alaska, sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) abundance using Bayesian probability theory. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45, 850-855.
  • Hallier J.P., Delgado de Molina A., 2000, Baitboat as a tuna aggregating device. Le canneur : un dispositif de concentration des thons. In: Le Gall J.-Y., Cayré P., Taquet M. (Eds.), Pêches thonières et dispositifs de concentration de poissons. Edn. Ifremer, Actes Colloq. 28, pp. 553-578.
  • Hallier J.P., Diouf T., Hervé A., Peignon C., 2001, Le Programme MAC : État des opérations et des analyses. Doc. multigraphié, CRODT, IRD, CNROP.
  • Hallier J.-P., Gaertner D., 2002, Comparative efficiency between Betyp tags and Conventional tags. ICCAT Coll. Vol. Sci. Pap. 54, 17-32.
  • Hilborn R., Liermann M., 1998, Standing on the shoulders of giants: learning from experience in fisheries. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish. 8, 273-283.
  • Hoenig J.M., Warren W.G., Stocker M. 1994, Bayesian and related approaches in fitting surplus production models. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51, 1823-1831.
  • Holbert D., Johnson J.C., 1989, Using prior information in fisheries management: A comparison of classical and Bayesian methods for estimating population parameters. Coast. Manage. 17, 333-347.
  • Kearney R.E. 1982, Methods used by the South Pacific Commission for the survey and assessment of skipjack and baitfish resources. SPC, Tech. Rep. 7, 21-43.
  • Leonard T., Hsu J.S.J., 1999, Bayesian Methods. An analysis for statisticians and interdisciplinary researchers. Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • Maunder M.N., 2001, A general framework for integrating the standardization of catch per unit of effort into stock assessment models. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58, 795-803 [CrossRef].
  • Maunder M.N., 2003, Paradigm shifts in fisheries stock assessment: from integrated analysis to Bayesian analysis and back again. Nat. Resour. Model. 16, 465-475.
  • McAllister M.K., Kirkwood G.P., 1998, Bayesian stock assessment: a review and example application using the logistic model. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 55, 1031-1060 [CrossRef].
  • Meyer R., Millar R.B., 1999, BUGS in Bayesian stock assessments. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56, 1078-1086 [CrossRef].
  • Millar R.B., 2002, Reference priors for Bayesian fisheries models. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59, 1492-1502 [CrossRef].
  • Prince E.D., Ortiz M., Venizelos A., Rosenthal D.S., 2002, In-water conventional tagging techniques developed by the Cooperative Tagging Center for large, highly migratory species. Am. Fish. Symp. 30, 155-171.
  • Punt A.E., Hilborn R., 1997, Fisheries stock assessment and decision analysis: the Bayesian approach. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish. 35-63.
  • Rivot E., Prevost E., 2002, Hierarchical Bayesian analysis of capture-mark-recapture data. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59, 1768-1784 [CrossRef].
  • Schweder T., 1998, Fisherian or Bayesian methods of integrating diverse statistical information? Fish. Res. 37, 61-75.
  • Vose D., 2001, Risk analysis. A quantitative guide. 2$^{\rm nd}$ edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.
  • Walters C.J., Ludwig D., 1994, Calculation of Bayes posterior probability distributions for key population parameters. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51, 713-722.



What is OpenURL?

The OpenURL standard is a protocol for transmission of metadata describing the resource that you wish to access. An OpenURL link contains article metadata and directs it to the OpenURL server of your choice. The OpenURL server can provide access to the resource and also offer complementary services (specific search engine, export of references...). The OpenURL link can be generated by different means.
  • If your librarian has set up your subscription with an OpenURL resolver, OpenURL links appear automatically on the abstract pages.
  • You can define your own OpenURL resolver with your EDPS Account. In this case your choice will be given priority over that of your library.
  • You can use an add-on for your browser (Firefox or I.E.) to display OpenURL links on a page (see http://www.openly.com/openurlref/). You should disable this module if you wish to use the OpenURL server that you or your library have defined.